Windows that have not been formally energy rated under the WER scheme, or have not received a formal U-value, can still comply with the building regulations come October 1.
In a letter which we received this week and also sent to all its members, Fensa offered two ways that installers could prove that their products achieve a U-value of 1.6W/m2K, which does not require costly formal processes.
In the lead up to October 1, when the new regulations are due to come into force, the BFRC had been promoting the Window Energy Rating scheme (WERs) as the preferred method of proving compliance with the building regulations – the government announced that windows with a WER of at least a C (up to a possible A) will comply. The alternative is the U-value method, which has received far less publicity, but in both cases, expensive formal testing, calculations and registration was required.
However, installers were told last week that Fensa inspectors would require no formal evidence of compliance if their timber (70mm depth min) or uPVC windows were constructed using soft coat low-e glass, warm edge spacer (16mm min), and 90% argon gas, “ie, there will be no need to provide further evidence to the consumer or to the Fensa inspector, providing there is no evidence to suggest that our assumption is incorrect”.
The letter also gave details of an online U-value calculator that can determine the whole window U-value. Available from mid-September, the calculator will store the details on a database alongside results from other authorised calculators. “These details will be passed to our inspectors when you, at the point of registration, indicate that the installation conforms to a particular calculation held in our database,” the letter explained. It will cost £199 a year to use, for an unlimited number of calculations.
Giles Willson, a director of the BFRC, was quoted as saying “The standard unit as per the press release two weeks ago installed in timber and five-chamber PVC-U systems will achieve a 1.6 U-value. This is not the only solution to achieve compliance – ie, I know some three-chamber systems will achieve the 1.6 with this spec unit, and other systems will achieve 1.6 without soft coat or gas or warm edge spacer bars.
“This is a spec which will work and is proven making life for compliance easier for large sectors of the market. The fact a more cost effective solution may be available by using WER or U-value calculation is down to the manufacturer.”
Seems to me like another money making scheme aimed at prising money out of us not so Cash Rich REPUTABLE companies already struggling under this recession.
No comments:
Post a Comment